Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs David Fleming Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Carabelli vs Fleming analysis and find out who is favored!
Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs David Fleming Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Carabelli 1 - 0 Fleming
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Carabelli has won 48.22% of points on their second serve, while Fleming has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Carabelli, in recent form, has won 55.38% of their opponent's second serve points, while Fleming has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.38% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Carabelli has saved 61.52% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fleming has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Carabelli has won 67.09% of matches played (W/L 53/ 26), with Fleming winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Carabelli has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 291/ 161), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Fleming has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 126/ 127), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 40% (W/L 4/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Carabelli has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 73.44% of matches (W/L 47/ 17), where as Fleming has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Carabelli winning 1 times and Fleming being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Carabelli winning 2 and Fleming winning 1. The last match between Carabelli and Fleming was at the Santiago Challenger, 11-11-2017, Q1 round, Clay with Camilo Ugo Carabelli getting the victory 4-6 6-4 2-0 ret..
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:43:5.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Carabelli and Fleming have played a deciding set 0 times, with Carabelli winning 0 times and Fleming 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Carabelli winning 0, and Fleming 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Carabelli has played against opponents with an average rank of 276.37 while Fleming has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Carabelli has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fleming has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Carabelli has converted 46.83% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fleming has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
114
Rank
96
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
32
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
63% (320-186)
Career Total W/L
49% (130-133)
66% (31-16)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$130,440
Career Prize Money
$0
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs David Fleming For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Carabelli VS Fleming
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Camilo Ugo Carabelli | David Fleming |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 12 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs Total | 6 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:5 | 1:43:5 |
| 1st Serve % | 51% (32/63) | 58% (48/83) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (22/32) | 58% (28/48) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (15/31) | 37% (13/35) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 45% (5/11) | 100% (4/4) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (42/83) | 41% (26/63) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-4 2-0 ret. |
Stats 
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
David Fleming
51%
(
32 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
48 of
83)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
9
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Camilo Ugo Carabelli | David Fleming |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 66% (31/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (65/42) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (567/490) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 66% (29/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 102 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 96 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 235.26 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (2191/3452) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (1462/2191) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (608/1261) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (177/378) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (1457/3425) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 76% (25/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (29/45) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (10/20) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 69% (9/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 96% (27/26) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 4% (27/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (20/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Camilo Ugo Carabelli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Maks Kasnikowski
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
57%
(
53 of
93)
1st Serve %
69%
(
67 of
97)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
47%
(
44 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
48 of
97)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
80%
(
57 of
71)
1st Serve %
79%
(
44 of
56)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Gastao Elias
65%
(
76 of
117)
1st Serve %
46%
(
49 of
106)
0
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
40%
(
47 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
114
Total Points Won
109
|
5-7 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
67%
(
55 of
82)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
66)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
12
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
39%
(
14 of
36)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
David Fleming Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Alejandro Hidalgo
Player
David Fleming
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Acevedo
Player
David Fleming
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Juan Carlos Saez
Player
David Fleming
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Fleming
Player
Tomas Gerini
62%
(
61 of
98)
1st Serve %
84%
(
89 of
106)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
51%
(
31 of
61)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
44 of
89)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
52%
(
51 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
54 of
106)
101
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 1-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
David Fleming
51%
(
32 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
48 of
83)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
9
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
4-6 6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Lenny Hampel
Player
David Fleming
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Carabelli Vs Fleming Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Carabelli are available here and Fleming photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
